Finding the best shoes for Walt Disney World and Disneyland is difficult. In our pursuit of perfection, we’ve learned that there’s no one-size-fits-all ‘favorite’ footwear. Nevertheless, we’ve gained tons of experience and worn out dozens of soles at the parks and share our findings with you here. (Updated July 11, 2025.)
Again, there is no such thing as “perfect” shoes for Walt Disney World. Like footwear itself, there are two parts to this. The first is that personal preference, individual comfort, and the unique contours of your feet and body are huge factors. If they weren’t, the scientists would’ve just perfected footwear decades ago and there’d be one pair of shoes everyone wears. Instead, there are thousands.
Second, it’s all about tradeoffs. This has been a difficult lesson that I’ve learned when chasing my other theme park white whale, which is photography. No lens, camera body, or tripod is perfect–they all come with compromises. With shoes, those include weight, cushioning, responsiveness, breathability, support, dryness, and so on.
The latest update for Summer 2025 comes as Amazon Prime Day is wrapping up and some of our favorite shoes are on sale. Here’s a quick rundown of the deals:
The top three shoes on that list are all among my favorites, with the Ghost Max being my new go-to, as covered in Sarah & Tom Bricker’s Top 7 Shoes for Disney. That’s essentially a 2025 update and expansion to this list, featuring results of extensive field-testing over the last year.
Unfortunately, none of Sarah’s favorites are on sale for Prime Day. She’s become a hardcore Hoka fan, and now owns a half-dozen pairs of the brand. She’s also found the ‘sweet spot’ for sales on that expensive and seldom-discounted brand, which is right as new models come out.
For example, her go-to is the Hoka Bondi, and the 9 version of that was released in mid-January. As a result, the 8s went on sale immediately–with clearance prices peaking a couple of months later. She ended up scoring pairs for half-off, which is almost unprecedented by Hoka standards. You won’t find deals anywhere near that good during Prime Day, or probably even Black Friday. The best shoe deals revolve around product cycles and clearancing out old unsold inventory.
Speaking of the aforementioned field testing and Hoka Bondis those are the clear winners for Sarah. They offer maximum cushioning for an ultra-plush ride. It’s their softest and least responsive shoe, offering a higher bed of super-soft cushioning and more forgiving impact.
The Hoka Bondi is very “cloudlike,” to borrow a term from that other brand. It’s also one of the ugliest shoes I’ve ever seen. The sole and heel are huge and clunky, enormously oversized to the point of looking comical. No offense to Sarah, but they look like clown shoes. More recently, she’s also become a big fan of the Hoka Gaviota, which is similar in cushioning but a bit less clownish.
Regardless of looks, Sarah loves Hokas. She also points out that it’s not like my shoes are hip, and also that oversized soles are currently in style for some dumb reason (she’s right on both counts, sadly). We logged roughly 20,000 steps per day in May and June, and Sarah wore the Hoka Bondi almost every single day. She never had any foot pain or injuries (aside of the norm) and she did so while babywearing most of the time.
Speaking of which, the Brooks Glycerin StealthFit is now my go-to regular walking shoe for Disney–but I also rotate shoes a lot more than Sarah. I’ve used a variety of Brooks, also including the Levitate and Ghost. I prefer either of those for their energy return when running, while favoring the Brooks Glycerin when walking. More recently, the above-mentioned Ghost Max has become my go-to, which I find to be very similar to the base model Glycerin.
I also have a variety of Nike and Adidas (as discussed below) that offer similar cushioning. And I likewise tested out both Hoka and On Clouds (albeit in-store, so much more limited testing). The styles I tried of both were great–definitely something I would’ve worn! However, they were also all full price, which was like $140+ for every single pair. I can get Brooks or Nike on sale for around half of that and these were nothing truly revolutionary to my feet, so I opted against buying them. The difference was more pronounced for Sarah–and could be for you, too.
For me, the Brooks Glycerin were the sweet spot of quality, cushioning, and cost. As someone who is a big fan of Nike Flyknit and pretty much any shoe with sock-like uppers, I loved the StealthFit in particular and bought that version. In looking at reviews, I see that not everyone agrees with that sentiment and most runners prefer the standard version. To each their own on that, I guess. Like shoes in general, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer!
I’m also a very big fan of the Crocs LiteRide 360 Pacer Sneakers when it comes to Walt Disney World, specifically. Over the years, this blog has had a love-hate relationship with Crocs. I think the normal clogs are hideous, but the comfort is undeniable. (I also love a lot of the over-the-top Walt Disney World Crocs designs–might as well lean into the ugliness of the footwear!)
For me, these have all of the normal upsides of Crocs without (most of?) the hideousness. They’re certainly not going to be spotted during Milan Fashion Week, but they’re far less eye-catching. They don’t stick out in person or in photos, instead having a neutral or ‘invisible’ appearance that disappears or blends into the background. Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so let’s instead talk performance.
I’ve worn the Crocs LiteRide Sneakers extensively on multiple days on both coasts and absolutely love them. The foam insoles are super-soft, incredibly light, and springy. The Crocs LiteRide Shoes offer sink-in softness while putting a bit of pep in your step, with the characteristic comfort of Crocs. (Meaning that if you think normal Crocs are comfortable, you’ll also like these; if you find normal Crocs uncomfortable, these won’t be what wins you over.)
Crocs LiteRides are my go-to shoes during storm season at Walt Disney World or for wearing to the beach. Outside of those circumstances and rainy days, I don’t wear them much in the ‘real world.’ They’re still Crocs, c’mon.
Prior to pregnancy and becoming a Hoka convert, Sarah also wore both the Crocs LiteRide Stretch Sandals and the OluKai Ohana Sandal. Both of these balance comfort and cuteness, and provide enough support so your feet won’t hurt after logging miles in the parks. As far as sandals go, both offer a surprising amount of arch support.
That’s exactly how I’d write a succinct review of Crocs clogs. The difference, from my perspective, between these sandals or Crocs clogs and the LiteRide shoes is that they’re essentially normal shoes. As much as I love the comfort of Crocs or their sandals, I can’t do a full day clocking 20k steps in them. They’re not as responsive as regular shoes and my feet have a bit too much freedom in them, with the end result being blisters.
The Crocs LiteRide Shoes are the best of both worlds–the comfort and springy steps of Crocs, coupled with the style and structure of shoes. One thing that’s also very important to me in a shoe is speed. This may not matter to many people, but I want to be able to power walk through the parks, accomplishing a lot during Early Entry and knocking out as many rides as possible at the end of the night when wait times are low. Regular Crocs are too loose-fitting and casual for that. The LiteRides are not–they are speedy shoes.
When it comes to Walt Disney World, one huge selling point is how shoes handle heat, humidity, and storm season. Part of the reason I like Crocs–and all more breathable shoes–is because my feet have an unrivaled ability to produce appalling odor. This might be TMI, but after wearing most regular shoes for a full day during the summer at Walt Disney World, my socks are essentially toxic waste. That is not an issue with Crocs.
Equally as important, Crocs are quick-drying. Afternoon showers can come out of nowhere at Walt Disney World, and even though we’re diligent about watching the weather radar and avoiding spontaneous storms, we still get caught in them from time to time. I’ve had pairs of shoes totally ruined as a result of the one-two punch of my stinky feet and getting (and staying) wet at Walt Disney World. (In fact, this is how/why most of my shoes have been “retired” over the last several years.)
With the Crocs LiteRide Shoes, I simply swap out my socks after an afternoon storm and am ready to roll. (I have friends who wear the LiteRides without socks; more power to those who can do that, but I can’t!) This is a really big deal to me and the main reason the Crocs LiteRide is now my go-to Walt Disney World shoe for the months of May through October.
With that said, I still won’t wear the Crocs LiteRide on consecutive full days in the parks. It’s not that I’ve tried and have had negative results, I’m just not willing to risk it. There are areas of the uppers where the fabric meets the mesh that looks and feels to me like it’d be a recipe for blisters if worn too frequently or without socks. Your mileage may vary on that, though. I don’t wear regular Crocs without socks, either.
As hinted at above, I also don’t wear Crocs LiteRides for November through April. I think Crocs LiteRide Shoes are the most well-rounded footwear for Walt Disney World, but all of the aforementioned qualities are not always needed. Other months of the year, there are more comfortable options that work better for me.
Currently, select styles of Crocs LiteRide 360 Pacer Shoes (for Men) and Crocs LiteRide 360 Pacer Shoes (for Women) are on sale at Amazon. I don’t know that this is actually a sale, as this deal was available when I bought my first pair.
For the other days when I don’t need the Crocs qualities, I’ve gone in a totally different direction: Adidas Ultraboost. I had heard people singing the praises of the Boost foam for years, but frankly, found the brand’s shoes a bit ugly and was skeptical that Adidas could actually deliver. Fast forward to last fall and I finally pulled the trigger on a ‘pop-culture’ pair of Boosts that I thought actually looked good…mere days before the affiliated designer finally and fully went off the deep end. Perfect timing.
Nevertheless, the comfort of the Boosts was immediately apparent and I opted to wear them during our month-long trip to Japan. The best way to describe Boosts is springy yet soft. The shoes offer a tremendous amount of cushioning and are plush as a result, but somehow also offer responsiveness and speed. They are perhaps the most paradoxical shoe I’ve ever worn, like an extremely exaggerated version of Crocs.
After logging at least 20,000 steps per day in the same pair of Boosts over the course of an entire month, my feet still felt great. For their part, the shoes also still looked great—they’re durable and grippy in addition to being bouncy. I’m now a Boost believer, and completely get the cult-like following.
I’ve had other shoes that ‘borrow’ from the Boost playbook, including the Nike React Infinity and ZoomX, as well as Brooks running shoes with their DNA technology. Those are all great shoes, but none even come close to rivaling what Adidas has accomplished with the Ultraboost. The offerings from Nike and Brooks are strong–and I definitely favor Nike Flyknit material–but the comfort did not compare.
With that said, there are some drawbacks–at least for me. My Boosts are heavy and clunky, and even with the more breathable primeknit upper, they’re still too hefty and thick for me to wear to Walt Disney World in the summer (when the Crocs come out to play). Not all Ultraboosts are like this–many have a sleeker profile and use thinner material for even better breathability.
Another shoe that does come close is the Nike Pegasus. This is one of the most popular and iconic running shoes of all-time, with responsive cushioning for an energized ride, along with lighter-weight energy return thanks to the ReactX foam midsole. While I think these are great running shoes, that serves a different need than visiting the parks. I prefer just a bit more plushness and slightly less responsiveness for days at Disney, so the Pegasus aren’t my preferred shoe for that.
The only exception is when doing runDisney events. For those races, the Nike Pegasus is my go-to shoe…for now. I recently ran the Disneyland Half Marathon in the Pegasus, although I debated whether to use the Brooks Ghost or Levitate, two other shoes I also use for running. But again, walking vs. running is a different dynamic.
Ultimately, as should be obvious here…or from customer reviews…or simply the range of footwear available in different styles and shapes…there is no perfect shoe solution. However, I’ve been incredibly satisfied with the Crocs LiteRide 360 Pacer Shoes, and frankly a bit surprised at how well they combine the strengths of Crocs and regular shoes, while eliminating many of the drawbacks at a relatively reasonable price.
At least for me, that makes them close to the perfect shoes for Walt Disney World, with the best balance of qualities and compromises for visiting the months of the year when Central Florida is hot and/or wet. (Read: most months!) Given how many Disney fans also seem to love Crocs, we figured sharing a heads up about this new-to-us shoe line from the popular brand was worth sharing. For those who are vehemently anti-Crocs, hopefully some of our other recommendations and thoughts on shoes that work best for us at Walt Disney World and beyond proved useful to you!
Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!
Your Thoughts
What are your favorite shoes for Walt Disney World or Disneyland? Do you opt for specific footwear that offers added comfort, support, or springiness when doing the parks, or just your ‘normal’ shoes? Have you tried the various varieties of Crocs in the parks? Did you like or dislike their performance? Do you prioritize function over fashion, or vice-versa? Any options that perform particularly well in the hot, humid, and wet weather of Central Florida? Do you agree or disagree with our advice? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback—even when you disagree with us—is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!